NASA Technical Report
Official/source metadataAutomated OCR and classification
AI-assisted summary
NASA report from January 8, 1973, documenting the Apollo 17 crew's science debriefing. It covers astronomical findings on ionized hydrogen, the Coma cluster, UV and X-ray backgrounds, and observations of Earth from space.
Generated from extracted text. Verify important claims against the original document.
▶ UAP Archives explainer
This video is UAP Archives editorial content based on the linked official records; it is not government footage.
Subscribe to UAP Archives on YouTube →
Related documents
Files connected by shared people, places, and events — and by appearing together in our cross-document analysis.
- pdfNASA internal fileshouston, texas · milky way · nasa
- pdfNASA Mercury Program file, likely a transcript of John Glenn's debriefing after the Friendship 7 (MA-6) mission.milky way · nasa · national aeronautics and space administration
- pdfNASA Apollo 17 Technical Crew Debriefingnasa · national aeronautics and space administration · manned spacecraft center
- pdfNASA Skylab Crew Debriefingshouston, texas · nasa · national aeronautics and space administration
- pdfNASA Gemini Program Filesmilky way · nasa · apollo
- pdfUSAF Scientific Advisory Board filesuniversity of colorado · nasa
Extracted images
Images flagged by the classifier as photographs, maps or sketches.
Pages (3)Machine-extracted text; expand to inspect pages and cite exact anchors. Verify against the PDF.View more ↓
CB/R.A.PARKER MSC-07632 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION * APOLLO 17 CREW DEBRIEFING FOR SCIENCE JANUARY 8, 1973 PREPARED BY SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS BRANCH PLANETARY AND EARTH SCIENCES DIVISION INDEXING DATA DATE OPR # T PGM SUBJECT SIGNATOR…
R.A. PARKER NASA NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER
119
119 HENRY (CONT'D) gravitationally holding it together. We though it might be in the form of ionized hydrogen. We looked for Lyman-alpha radiation, red shifted from the ionized hydrogen, and we didn't see any. We set a lower limit, which certainly ex- cludes the possibility that…
HENRY Dr. Trombka
120
120 HENRY (CONT'D) star; however, we know that there were no hot stars within our field of view. Therefore, the most conservative inter- pretation, I think, is that what we're seeing is light from hot stars in the galactic plane going up out of the plane and reflecting off inters…
HENRY Gary Thomas Charles Barthum